Refutation & Rebuttal

In debate, you will be required to respond to the various other arguments presented within rounds. And despite case construction being the essential backbone of any argumentation presented, refutation and rebuttal are what bring on the argumentative “back-and-forth” nature of a debate. However, as outlined by the NSDA (National Speech & Debate Association), speakers need to aim to: identify and discuss the biggest questions and clashes in the debate, rebut the most crucial points, and contribute original refutation to have a productive round.
Do’s and Dont’s
Do’s Dont's
  • Identify the largest questions around central points of clash
  • Refute the most notably important contentions made by the opposing bench
  • Continue to formulate new lines of analysis and extensions within pre-existing refutation
  • Create new rebuttals
  • Structurally organize rebuttals (i.e., signposting, offering the comparative mechanization and impact)
  • Use the established framework to your advantage when it comes to weighing the debate/worlds
  • Respond to refutation given by your opponents in a way that is effectively new to the round
  • Ignore or completely drop key points of clash
  • Make extreme generalizations and create overly vague or general lines of refutation
  • Intentionally misrepresent or strawman your opponent’s case
  • Recycle rebuttal
  • Take every piece of refutation to have an equal role in the debate (i.e., spending equal amounts of time on every single contention and refutation that follows. There are some pieces of rebuttal that are far more important in round, and therefore, will require more time to analyze whereas some contentions may only require a line or two of actual rebuttal)
Common Techniques of Refutation
Assertion
Dissection
Counter
Minimizing Impact
Turns
Re-establishment of Definitions/Model